Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Jun 21;20(8):1718–1725. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0423

Table 2.

Odds of a square becoming the location of a subsequent breast tumour in relation to its percent mammographic density 5 years prior to diagnosis

Grid length
(cm)
Within-breast quartiles
of square-specific
percent MD
No. of squares in
which tumour arises a
OR (95% CI) b
4 1 (lowest) 26 1
2 48 1.5 (0.9, 2.5)
3 66 2.5 (1.6, 4.1)
4 (highest) 74 2.6 (1.6, 4.2)
P for linear trend < 0.001
3 1 (lowest) 19 1
2 44 2.3 (1.3, 4.0)
3 69 3.9 (2.3, 6.4)
4 (highest) 91 4.6 (2.8, 7.6)
P for linear trend < 0.001
2 1 (lowest) 15 1
2 32 2.1 (1.1, 3.8)
3 71 4.9 (2.8, 8.6)
4 (highest) 111 6.4 (3.7, 11.1)
P for linear trend < 0.001
1 1 (lowest) 3 1
2 32 6.1 (1.9, 20.1)
3 63 16.6 (5.2, 53.2)
4 (highest) 130 25.5 (8.1, 80.3)
P for linear trend < 0.001

MD=mammographic density

a

The total number is less than 231 because tumour-squares for which no control squares of similar size (i.e. within 10%) could be identified were excluded (see Methods section).

b

Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) estimated using a conditional logistic regression model where the matching set is a woman’s pre-diagnostic breast consisting of a square where the tumour will subsequently originate (tumour-square) and several tumour-free squares (control-squares) (see Methods section).