Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 11.
Published in final edited form as: Eurographics Workshop Vis Comput Biomed. 2010;2010:117–124.

Table 2.

The chart plots the average user preference between two rendering techniques for three different applications and overall utility. A value of 1 was given for WDT rendering and a value of 5 was given for traditional segment rendering (TSR). A value of 3 indicates equal preference. The WDT technique was generally prefered except for showing the shape of the structure.

Non-Medical users Medical users
Showing shape 3.6 Prefer WDT graphic file with name nihms238732t1.jpg Prefer TSR 3.5 Prefer WDT graphic file with name nihms238732t2.jpg Prefer TSR
Showing context 1.5 Prefer WDT graphic file with name nihms238732t3.jpg Prefer TSR 2.0 Prefer WDT graphic file with name nihms238732t4.jpg Prefer TSR
Localizing structures 2.6 Prefer WDT graphic file with name nihms238732t5.jpg Prefer TSR 2.3 Prefer WDT graphic file with name nihms238732t6.jpg Prefer TSR
Overall utility 2.5 Prefer WDT graphic file with name nihms238732t7.jpg Prefer TSR 2.3 Prefer WDT graphic file with name nihms238732t8.jpg Prefer TSR