Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Educ Behav. 2011 May 6;39(4):386–395. doi: 10.1177/1090198110394174

Table 2.

Baseline Characteristics of the Study Participants by Intervention Group§

Characteristic PLP (N=72) SBP (N=72)


n (%) or M ± SD n (%) or M ± SD
Ethnicity
     Chuukese 14 (19) 24 (33)
     Filipino 5 (7) 4 (6)
     Native Hawaiian 39 (54) 36 (50)
     Samoan 10 (14) 6 (8)
     Other Pacific Islander 2 (3) 0 (0)
     Non-Pacific Islander 2 (3) 2 (3)
Community Organization
     Kula no Nā Po‘e Hawai‘i§ 21 (29) 9 (13)
     Hawai‘i Maoli§ 8 (11) 12 (17)
     Ke Ola Mamo 17 (24) 20 (28)
     Kokuka Kalihi Valley 12 (17) 11 (15)
     Kalihi-Pālama Health Cntr 14 (19) 20 (28)
Age (years)٨ 50 ± 14 49 ± 15
Females 56 (78) 66 (92)
Education level٨
     Less than H.S. 16 (23) 18 (25)
     H.S. diploma/GED 16 (23) 16 (22)
     Some college/tech. 20 (28) 21 (29)
     College degree 19 (27) 17 (24)
Marital Status
     Never married 16 (22) 21 (29)
     Currently married 40 (56) 32 (44)
     Disrupted marital status 16 (22) 19 (26)
Weight (kg)* 107 ± 32 99 ± 27
BMI 40 ± 9.6 39 ± 8.3

Note. PLP=PILI Lifestyle Program, SBP = Standard Behavioral Follow-up Program.

§

Baseline= time point immediately following randomization into weight loss maintenance intervention.

Fisher’s exact test, p=0.0353.

Fisher’s exact test, Kula vs. Kalihi-Pālama, p=0.0257.

§

Fisher’s exact test, Kula vs. Hawai‘i Maoli, p=0.0451.

At end of weight loss treatment program (prior to weight loss maintenance intervention).

٨

Education level and age unknown for 1 participant.

*

The difference in baseline weights (µd=7.0, 95% CI=−2.7–17) did not differ statistically from zero (p=0.16).