Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2011 Apr 22;33(3):624.e1–624.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.03.003

Table 1.

Subject characteristics and FDG-PET regions-of-interest measures by family history group

NH PH MH
N 36 24 36
Age (yrs) 63(12) 58(9) 60(9)
Gender (males/females) 11/25 13/11 10/26
Education (yrs) 16(2) 17(2) 16(2)
Apolipoprotein E ε4 genotype (ε4-/ε4+) 28/8 11/13* 19/17*
Maternal age at subjects’ birth (yrs) 29(4) 28(5) 28(5)
Paternal age at subjects’ birth (yrs) 32(5) 34(7) 32(6)
Affected parent’s age at onset (yrs) - 77(10) 69(8)
Mini Mental State Examination 29.4(1.2) 29.7(0.8) 29.7(0.5)
Designs 6.2(2.2) 7.4(2.5) 6.9(1.9)
Digit symbol substitution test 58.0(9.5) 62.0(9.3) 56.5(8.6)
Object naming 56.2(4.5) 52.1(8.1) 53.9(5.7)
Paired Associates delayed recall 9.9(4.0) 10.2(2.3) 8.9(2.9)
Paragraph delayed recall 6.1(2.1) 6.2(3.1) 5.9(2.2)
Visual recognition test 13.3(14.7) 12.5(14.3) 18.6(11.9)
WAIS vocabulary 67.9(7.8) 70.6(8.7) 66.7(9.2)

Values are means (SD)

*

Different from NH, P<0.05