Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 6;62(2):347–360. doi: 10.1007/s00248-011-9841-8

Table 3.

Summary of mixed-effect regression models describing relative abundance of each morphotype as a function of latitude

Model Species LogLik Parameter Value Std. error F p
1 Gc 63.208 Intercept 0.389 0.015 697.875 0.000
Latitude −0.079 0.014 30.753 0.000
Elevation 0.002 0.014 0.022 0.884
Lat. × Elev. −0.030 0.015 4.156 0.049
2 Om 69.500 Intercept 0.411 0.014 865.466 0.000
Latitude 0.028 0.013 4.229 0.047
Elevation 0.003 0.013 0.046 0.832
Lat. × Elev. 0.011 0.014 0.666 0.420
3 LI 71.595 Intercept 0.198 0.015 183.331 0.000
Latitude 0.104 0.014 55.168 0.000
Elevation −0.001 0.013 0.003 0.956
Lat. × Elev. 0.017 0.014 1.509 0.227

In all models, landscape ID (see Table 1) was used as a random effect, and latitude and elevation were used as fixed effects

Gc, G. clavigera; Om, O. montium; Ll, L. longiclavatum