Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 30;17(2):120–130. doi: 10.4258/hir.2011.17.2.120

Table 2.

Comparisons of different term ranking algorithms for different term reweighting methods (R = 10 and E = 25)

graphic file with name hir-17-120-i002.jpg

The mean average precision is presented for a combination of term ranking (rows) and term reweighting (columns) methods, including, in parentheses, the percent (%) improvement from the unexpanded queries.

EMIM: expected mutual information measure, F4: F4MODIFIED, IDF: inverse document frequency, KLD: Knullback-Leibler divergence, LCA: local context analysis, RSV: Robertson selection value.

a(p < 0.05) and b(p < 0.01) are in bold.