Table 1.
ALT (U/l) | AST (U/l) | ALP (IU/l) | Total protein (g/dl) | Glucose (mg/dl) | Area of damage (%) | Glucose (mg/dl) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment | |||||||
Saline control | 67.4 ± 1.7 | 77.8 ± 3.9 | 122.6 ± 11.1 | 9.1 ± 0.6 | 96.0 ± 7.6 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 96.0 ± 7.6 |
CCl4 control | 125.5 ± 6.3 | 156.2 ± 4.5 | 198.4 ± 5.8 | 8.3 ± 0.2 | 51.0 ± 4.5 | 21.6 ± 1.4 | 51.0 ± 4.5 |
+ Silymarin 25 mg/kg | 71.2 ± 6.6* | 84.8 ± 7.4* | 124.0 ± 11.6* | 8.7 ± 0.5 | 59.0 ± 7.8 | 9.0 ± 1.1* | 59.0 ± 7.8 |
+ Ribavirin 30 mg/kg | 27.0 ± 3.1* | 82.0 ± 5.7* | 152.0 ± 12.4* | 8.8 ± 0.4 | 80.0 ± 4.9* | 9.6 ± 0.8* | 80.0 ± 4.9 |
+ Ribavirin 60 mg/kg | 22.5 ± 2.8* | 97.8 ± 6.7 | 166.6 ± 14.6 | 8.9 ± 1.0 | 74.3 ± 4.1* | 6.2 ± 0.5* | 74.3 ± 4.1 |
+ Ribavirin 90 mg/kg | 31.2 ± 2.6* | 95.6 ± 8.4* | 155.6 ± 13.5 | 9.9 ± 0.6 | 77.1 ± 6.9* | 4.3 ± 0.5* | 77.1 ± 6.9 |
+ Ribavirin 30 mg/kg | 21.7 ± 3.4* | 50.7 ± 6.0*+ | 152.6 ± 7.8 | 10.2 ± 0.6 | 76.1 ± 6.1* | 8.9 ± 0.6* | 76.1 ± 6.1 |
+ silymarin 25 mg/kg | |||||||
+ Ribavirin 60 mg/kg | 24.9 ± 2.3* | 52.8 ± 5.7*+ | 119.0 ± 12.8*+ | 10.0 ± 0.7 | 98.7 ± 8.3*+ | 5.2 ± 0.4* | 98.7 ± 8.3 |
+ silymarin 25 mg/kg | |||||||
+ Ribavirin 90 mg/kg | 22.5 ± 1.8* | 49.0 ± 4.1*+ | 80.6 ± 7.0*+ | 11.2 ± 0.7* | 112.3 ± 9.6*+ | 4.8 ± 0.5* | 112.3 ± 9.6 |
+ silymarin 25 mg/kg |
Results are means ± S.E. Data were analyzed by one way ANOVA and means of different groups were compared by Duncan’s multiple range test. Two-tailed probabilities of less than 0.05 were considered significant.
p < 0.05 vs CCl4 control.
p < 0.05 vs corresponding ribavirin alone-treated group.