Table 1.
Comparison of the proposed and the competing methods on the BT426 dataset
| Predictor | Qtotal | MCC | Qobserved | Qpredicted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| This paper | 87.2 | 0.66 | 75.9 | 73.8 |
| Zheng and Kurgan [27] | 80.9 | 0.47 | 55.6 | 62.7 |
| Hu and Li [24] | 79.8 | 0.47 | 68.9 | 55.6 |
| DEBT [26] | 79.2 | 0.48 | 70.1 | 54.8 |
| BTSVM [21] | 78.7 | 0.45 | 62.0 | 56.0 |
| MOLEBRNN [18] | 77.9 | 0.45 | 66.0 | 53.9 |
| Zhang et al. [20] | 77.3 | 0.45 | 67.0 | 53.1 |
| BETAPRED2 [17] | 75.5 | 0.43 | 72.3 | 49.8 |
| Kim [19] | 75.0 | 0.40 | 66.7 | 46.5 |
| COUDES [11] | 74.8 | 0.42 | 69.9 | 46.5 |
| BTPRED [30] | 74.4 | 0.35 | 57.3 | 48.3 |
Note: Results of other β-turn prediction methods are obtained from the paper which proposed DEBT method.