Table 4.
Isolate | Closest marker | Chromosome position | Phenotypic data seta | Resistance source | N | P | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDb (cM) | LOD | Exp. (%) | PD (cM) | LOD | Exp. (%) | |||||
IPO323 | wPt-0836 | 3AS | R1 | Balance | 0 | 12.2 | 46.1 | 1 | 7.3 | 27.7 |
R2 | 1 | 25.5 | 73.7 | 1 | 11.1 | 39.7 | ||||
R3 | 1 | 25.6 | 73.1 | 1 | 10.8 | 38.7 | ||||
Xgpw5176-Xgpw3087 c | 6DS | R1 | Balance | 3.2–5 | 3.6 | 12.7 | ||||
R2 | 0.3–8 | 3.1 | 8.9 | |||||||
R3 | 4.3–4 | 3.5 | 11 | |||||||
IPO98022 | Xgpw5176-Xgpw3087 c | 6DS | R1 | Balance | 6.3–2 | 6.4 | 30.4 | 5.3–3 | 16.3 | 47 |
R2 | 8.3–0 | 5.4 | 21.6 | 5.3–3 | 13.1 | 47.4 | ||||
R3 | 0.3–8 | 4.4 | 18.8 | 5.3–3 | 12.3 | 48 | ||||
Xgwm111 | 7DS | R1 | Apache | 1.1 | 6.2 | 11.8 | ||||
R2 | 0 | 5.2 | 11.2 | |||||||
R3 | 0 | 2.2d | 5.9 | |||||||
IPO89011 | Xgpw5176-Xgpw3087 c | 6DS | Ave. | Balance | 5.3–3 | 23.16 | 67.5 | |||
wPt-1859 | 7DL | Ave. | Apache | 0 | 4.5 | 8 | ||||
IPO98046 | Xgwm111 | 7DS | R1 | Apache | 0 | 9.5 | 27.5 | |||
R2 | −e | – | – | |||||||
R3 | 0 | 6.2 | 20.8 | |||||||
Xgpw313 | 7DL | R1 | Apache | – | – | – | ||||
R2 | 5 | 6.8 | 20.5 | |||||||
R3 | – | – | – | |||||||
Ave. | ||||||||||
Xgpw5176-Xgpw3087 c | 6DS | R1 | Balance | 8.3–0 | 7 | 19 | ||||
R2 | 8.3–0 | 7.9 | 24.2 | |||||||
R3 | 6.3–2 | 7.4 | 27.1 | |||||||
IPO87016 | wPt-2019 | 1BS | R1 | Apache | 2 | 19.1 | 63.3 | |||
R2 | 1 | 21.1 | 68.3 | |||||||
R3 | 0 | 17.8 | 59.3 | |||||||
Ave. | 1 | 21.11 | 67.3 |
aR1, R2 and R3 represent first, second and third replicate data. QTL analysis was performed on averaged data (Ave) when Bartlett’s χ 2 test indicated nonsignificant phenotypic variation over replicates, otherwise replicates were processed individually
bPD, QTL peak distance in cM
cFlanking markers
dNot significant, but consistent QTL position
eNo QTL detected