Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 21.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2011 May 31;123(24):2784–2791. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.000620

Table 3.

Multivariate analysis: effect of therapies during follow-up on the risk of recurrent syncope in LQT1 and LQT2 women*

MENOPAUSAL PHASE LQT1 WOMEN LQT2 WOMEN
Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) P value Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) P value
Post-menopause vs. pre-menopause risk by treatment with estrogen therapy
Post-menopause without estrogen
HRT vs. reproductive period
0.20
(0.02 - 2.08)
0.18 7.73
(2.22 - 26.93)
<0.001
Post-menopause with estrogen
HRT vs. reproductive period
0.46
(0.07 - 3.07)
0.42 5.10
(1.62-15.97)
<0.001
Beta-blocker effect
Beta-blocker- vs, no beta-blocker-therapy 0.40
(0.17 - 0.87)
0.02 0.51
(0.29 - 0.89)
0.02
*

Multivariate analysis was carried out using combined PWP and Anderson-Gill modeling, with the menopausal periods and therapies assessed as time-dependent covariates in the multivariate models; findings are adjusted time-dependent beta-blocker therapy and QTc (assessed as a continuous measure); similar results were obtained in a secondary analysis that included further adjustment for time-dependent comorbidities (including diabetes mellitus, smoking status, prior myocardial infarction, and the presence of angina pectoris).

Estrogen therapy during the postmenopausal phase was assessed as a time-dependent covariate; the effects of progesterone therapy and of estrogen therapy during the transitional phases were not assessed due to sample size limitations.