Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 22;12:173. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-173

Table 3.

Final list of generalizability items

Generalizability item Modea NMode of NTotal (%)b Preference for mode valuec
Patient demographics

Age 5 years 22 of 31 (71) M

Gender 10% 20 of 30 (67) M

Diagnosis 10% 17 of 31(55) L

BMI 5 points 16 of 29 (55) L

Component positioning

TKA Hip Knee Angle 5 degrees 13 of 24 (54) L

Varus/valgus tibial component 3 degrees 17 of 25 (68) M

Slope of tibial component 3 degrees 15 of 24 (63) L

THA Inclination of acetabular cup 10 degrees 19 of 28 (68) M

Varus/valgus femoral stem 5 degrees 16 of 27 (60) L

Post-operative functioning

TKA Knee Society Score 10 points 18 of 23 (78) M

Knee Society Function Score 10 points 20 of 24 (83) H

Range of Motion 10 degrees 18 of 24 (75) M

KOOS 10 points 11 of 17 (65) L

WOMAC Knee 10 points 11 of 19 (58) L

Oxford Knee Score 5 points 18 of 24 (82) H

THA Harris Hip Score 10 points 17 of 21 (81) H

HOOS 10 points 12 of 17 (71) M

WOMAC Hip 10 points 12 of 20 (60) M

Oxford Hip Score 5 points 16 of 22 (73) M

Regional influences

Are the studies from the same region (developing country or western countries//continents)?

Are the studies similar in type en experience of the surgeon (academic; high volume; consultant; trainee)?

Are two studies similar regarding hospital type (developer hospital/special institute/regular hospital)?

A Mode: the value that was chosen most frequently (e.g. 5 years)

b NMode = the number of experts who chose the mode value

NTotal = the total number of experts who considered the generalizability item relevant

c H = High preference, 80% or more of the experts chose the mode value

M = Moderate preference, between 67% and 80% of experts chose the mode value

L = Low preference, less than 67% of experts chose the mode value

Example: the preference for the mode value "5 years" is moderate.