Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 25;108(32):13029–13034. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016709108

Table 3.

Cutoff ages for age effects in humans

Brain region Age model Cutoff age Reduced sample n Reduced sample P
Human neocortical gray matter Linear 58 (57) 53 (52) 0.078 (0.092)
Quadratic 61 (27) 57 (16) 0.051 (0.101)
Cubic 65 (–) 63 (–) 0.071 (–)
Human frontal lobe gray matter Linear 57 (–) 52 (–) 0.058 (–)
Quadratic 50 (–) 46 (–) 0.051 (–)
Cubic 41 (–) 34 (–) 0.080 (–)
Human neocortical white matter Linear 74 (74) 79 (79) 0.145 (0.125)
Quadratic 79 (74) 83 (79) 0.057 (0.215)
Cubic 79 (74) 83 (79) 0.056 (0.206)
Human frontal lobe white matter Linear 73 (69) 77 (74) 0.057 (0.108)
Quadratic 74 (74) 79 (79) 0.106 (0.083)
Cubic 74 (74) 79 (79) 0.119 (0.090)
Human hippocampus Linear 82 (82) 85 (85) 0.071 (0.066)
Quadratic 88 (88) 86 (86) 0.090 (0.086)
Cubic 82 (82) 85 (85) 0.159 (0.148)

When datapoints older than or equal to the cutoff ages are removed, age is no longer significantly associated with brain region size. Boldface values indicate the best-fit models identified in Table 1. Cutoff ages and associated P values are identified using the two methods described in Materials and Methods; values in parentheses are for the method using degrees-of-freedom based on the full human sample size (maximum age = 88, n = 87). A dash indicates that the age effect remains significant even at the smallest possible sample size for which model parameters could be calculated (n = 7, with one brain at age 22 and six brains at age 23) when the model is evaluated as if it had the full sample size of n = 87.