Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 30;4(3):331–341. doi: 10.4056/sigs.1864526

Table 5. Pairwise comparison of M. australiensis, T. thermosaccharolyticum and C. saccharolyticus using the GGDC-Calculator.

   HSP length /
   total length [%]
   identities /
   HSP length [%]
   identities /
   total length [%]
M. australiensis    T. thermosaccharolyticum    2.02    86.8    1.84
M. australiensis    C. saccharolyticus    1.16    86.9    1.01
C. saccharolyticus    T. thermosaccharolyticum    2.37    85.5    2.03