Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Public Econ. 2011 Oct 1;95(9-10):1168–1177. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.005

Table 5.

Sensitivity Analyses

Specification Pubs in Yrs 1–5 Citations in Yrs 1–5 NIH funding in Yrs 6–10 (/$100,000)
(1) Baseline 0.79 (0.98) 33.79 (62.18) 6.48** (1.79)
(2) No covariates −2.29 (1.51) −79.20 (73.80) 4.57** (2.03)
(3) Including Institutes with Few Grants or Higher Error Rates 0.84 (0.98) 33.10 (62.41) 6.73** (1.82)
(4) Restricting Sample to Institutes with Lower Error Rates 0.45 (1.21) 5.36 (80.40) 7.43** (2.12)
(5) Dropping Observations at Cutoff 0.62 (0.91) 7.65 (59.24) 6.49** (1.68)
(6) Using Observations within 100 Points of Cutoff 0.67 (2.72) 353.93** (177.08) 14.62** (4.84)
(7) Using Observations within 150 Points of Cutoff 0.81 (1.44) 61.64 (90.63) 6.03** (2.58)
(8) Using Observations within 250 Points of Cutoff 0.63 (0.72) −9.17 (45.73) 5.46** (1.33)
(9) Using Observations within 300 Points of Cutoff 0.68 (0.57) −45.15 (36.75) 4.21** (1.03)
(10) Including only linear term in the rating −0.30 (0.66) −164.06** (44.03) 0.04 (1.30)
(11) Including 3rd order polynomials in the rating 0.14 (1.86) 85.65 (120.56) 7.42** (3.37)
(12) Only using Variation Attributable to Cutoff 1.00 (1.03) 43.10 (66.10) 6.90** (1.87)

Notes: The specifications are identical to those in Table 3 except as indicated.

**

indicates statistical significance at the 5 percent level;

*

indicates significance at the 10 percent level.