Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2011 Aug 1;60(4):541–557. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2011.00765.x

Table 2.

Comparing our hierarchical Bayesian model to alternative approaches based on the average AUC (presented in percentage) over 100 simulated data sets for each simulation. The numbers in parentheses show the corresponding standard errors.

GSEA Mean.z Mean.abs.z Maxmean LME BGSA
Simulation 1 60.0 (0.71) 65.3 (0.98) 67.7 (1.20) 80.9 (0.97) 80.8 (1.16) 87.2 (0.87)
Simulation 2 60.4 (0.74) 61.0 (0.92) 65.8 (1.00) 68.9 (1.08) 76.3 (1.14) 79.1 (1.10)
Simulation 3 60.2 (0.76) 61.2 (0.84) 64.7 (0.97) 68.7 (1.03) 74.8 (1.11) 77.0 (1.08)