Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 16.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Dec;33(12):1363–1373. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.184

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Figure 1

(A) African-Americans; (B) Caucasians. Association of BMI with AT and SM volumes, expressed as ratios to height2, in men (left) and women (right). Black symbols and whole lines denote AT, and grey symbols and dashed lines denote SM. [AT men: African American, y=-26.9+1.6x (R2, 0.71, p<0.0001); Caucasian, y=−17.0+1.3x (R2, 0.64, p<0.0001). AT women: African American, y=−19.8+1.5x+0.011x2 (R2, 0.84, p<0.0001); Caucasian, y=-25.8+1.9x+0.007x2 (R2, 0.92, p<0.0001)]

[SM men: African American, y=8.4+0.92x (R2, 0.68, p<0.0001); Caucasian, y=8.3+0.83x (R2, 0.58, p<0.0001). SM women: African American, y=10.0+0.55x (R2, 0.56, p<0.0001); Caucasian, y=13.0+0.38x (R2, 0.53, p<0.0001)].