Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Addict. 2011 Jul 18;20(5):462–467. doi: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2011.00150.x

Table 2.

Zero-inflated negative binomial regression model predicting Number of Cigarettes Smoked during the Baseline Week (N=90, χ2(13)=78.81, p<0.001

Coef Robust
SE
Significance Lower
95% CI
Upper
95% CI
Number of Cigarettes smoked during Baseline Week
Age .00 .01 .601 −.01 .02
Male(vs. female) .02 .14 .909 −.26 .29
Caucasian (vs. not) .41 .13 .002 .14 .67
Use of Recreational Drugs (vs. not) −.41 .15 .008 −.71 −.11
Calgary Depression Score .00 .02 .958 −.04 .04
Schizophrenia Diagnosis (vs. Schizoaffective) −.24 .15 .120 −.54 .06
PANSS Positive Score −.01 .02 .489 −.04 .02
PANSS Negative Score −.01 .02 .451 −.05 .02
PANSS General Score .03 .01 .025 .00 .05
Atypical (versus Conventional) Antipsychotic −.37 .19 .036 −.76 −.03
Both Atypical AND Conventional (versus Conventional) Antipsychotic .15 .30 .622 −.44 .73
Zero-Inflation in Number of Cigarettes Smoked during Baseline Week
Use of Recreational Drugs (vs. not) −1.41 .73 .053 −2.84 .02
Calgary Score .15 .11 .173 −.65 .36
PANSS Positive −.00 .10 .998 −.19 .19
PANSS Negative −.02 .10 .815 −.21 .17
PANSS General −.08 .06 .166 −.21 .04