Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep;179(3):1347–1359. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.05.055

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Experimental approach for separate analysis of attacked and nonattacked myofiber subsets in sIBM. A: The focal nature of inflammatory infiltrates in IBM. Muscle tissue was stained with anti-CD8 (red) and anti-HLA-ABC (green) antibodies, as described in Materials and Methods. A shows a confocal image, C shows unembedded dry tissue. All myofibers are HLA-ABC positive, but only some are attacked by CD8+ T cells (AIBM), whereas others are spared (NIBM). B: Myofibers in direct contact with at least three CD8+ T cells or invaded by at least one CD8+ T cell were defined as AIBM. Myofibers not in contact with any CD8+ T cells were defined as NIBM. Ambiguous myofibers were not sampled. Laser-capture microdissection was used to pressure catapult the different types of myofibers into collecting tubes. In total, 100,000 μm2 of AIBM and NIBM myofibers was sampled from each patient with sIBM, as was the same amount of HCTRL myofibers from each control subject. C: Double immunostaining for HLA-ABC (green) and CD8 (red), according to the protocol described in Materials and Methods. Only myofiber tissue (star) was isolated, avoiding surrounding lymphocytes (red). D: Corresponding bright-light image after the myofiber was dissected and catapulted out of the tissue. C and D: The numbers in the yellow fields refer to apparatus parameters. Scale bars = 50 μm (A and C).