Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr. 2011 Apr 27;159(3):458–465.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.02.036

Table II.

Subject tracking information

Diagnostic group No. Mean no. of visits (SD) Most recent diagnostic age (mo; SD) % Sample tracked until 24 mo or greater % Sample tracked until 32 mo or greater
ASD 32 6.0 (2.5) 34.7 (8.8) 97 72
Prior positive ASD test result* 5 4.8 (2.2) 32.0 (8.9) 80 60
LD 56 4.4 (2.4) 25.9 (9.2) 54 30
DD 9 5.8 (2.9) 33.4 (9.8) 78 67
Other 36 4.3 (2.1) 25.7 (8.6) 61 26
False-positive 46 4.6 (2.3) 25.4 (8.7) 61 28
Typical 41 4.3 (2.7) 25.5 (10.3) 56 42
*

Indicates a failure on the ADOS-T, as well as a clear clinical judgment of ASD during early testing phases. At follow-up visits, these five toddlers no longer met ADOS-T or clinical judgment for ASD. Also note that there were also a small percentage of infants who met criteria for ASD on the ADOS-T but were not considered at-risk for an ASD because of clinical judgment. Children with profound mental retardation or those with scores only in the mild range of concern, for example, have a high false-positive rate on the ADOS-T.14