Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 17;26(9):2558–2569. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der192

Table II.

Summary of fertile versus infertile men data set correlations.

Comparison r
Donor H3K4me3 versus Patient 1 H3K4me3 0.786
Donor H3K4me3 versus Patient 2 H3K4me3 0.826
Donor H3K4me3 versus Patient 3 H3K4me3 0.788
Donor H3K4me3 versus Patient 4H3K4me3 0.868
Donor H3K4me3 versus Patient 5 H3K4me3 0.698
Donor H3K4me3 versus Patient 6 H3K4me3 0.749
Donor H3K4me3 versus Patient 7 H3K4me3 0.749
Donor H3K27me3 versus Patient 1 H3K27me3 0.807
Donor H3K27me3 versus Patient 2 H3K27me3 0.771
Donor H3K27me3 versus Patient 3 H3K27me3 0.818
Donor H3K27me3 versus Patient 4 H3K27me3 0.787
Donor H3K27me3 versus Patient 5 H3K27me3 0.666
Donor H3K27me3 versus Patient 6 H3K27me3 0.775
Donor H3K27me3 versus Patient 7 H3K27me3 0.785

Correlations for sequencing data were calculated using a 500-bp sliding window, moving every 100 bp. Windows with ≥5 reads were included in the analysis.