Table II.
Comparison | r |
---|---|
Donor H3K4me3 versus Patient 1 H3K4me3 | 0.786 |
Donor H3K4me3 versus Patient 2 H3K4me3 | 0.826 |
Donor H3K4me3 versus Patient 3 H3K4me3 | 0.788 |
Donor H3K4me3 versus Patient 4H3K4me3 | 0.868 |
Donor H3K4me3 versus Patient 5 H3K4me3 | 0.698 |
Donor H3K4me3 versus Patient 6 H3K4me3 | 0.749 |
Donor H3K4me3 versus Patient 7 H3K4me3 | 0.749 |
Donor H3K27me3 versus Patient 1 H3K27me3 | 0.807 |
Donor H3K27me3 versus Patient 2 H3K27me3 | 0.771 |
Donor H3K27me3 versus Patient 3 H3K27me3 | 0.818 |
Donor H3K27me3 versus Patient 4 H3K27me3 | 0.787 |
Donor H3K27me3 versus Patient 5 H3K27me3 | 0.666 |
Donor H3K27me3 versus Patient 6 H3K27me3 | 0.775 |
Donor H3K27me3 versus Patient 7 H3K27me3 | 0.785 |
Correlations for sequencing data were calculated using a 500-bp sliding window, moving every 100 bp. Windows with ≥5 reads were included in the analysis.