Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 12;27(17):2338–2345. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr402

Table 1.

CNVs in DGV (column 2), sensitivity of SDMF with respect to DGV (column 3), κ statistic (column 4), CNVs in DGV and in this study, with at least 10% frequency (columns 5 and 6), sensitivity of SDMF with respect CNVs in DGV with at least 10% frequency (column 7) and the corresponding κ (column 8).

Chr DGV Sens. SDMF w.r.t. DGV κ SDMF ≥10% DGV ≥10% Sens. SDMF w.r.t. DGV>10% κ10%
1 1235 0.44 0.41 1178 115 0.92 0.15
2 833 0.46 0.46 586 83 0.89 0.21
3 726 0.42 0.5 456 82 0.96 0.29
4 727 0.34 0.38 478 108 0.91 0.32
5 652 0.31 0.32 495 80 0.95 0.26
6 586 0.43 0.4 550 100 0.9 0.27
7 642 0.48 0.56 423 75 0.94 0.27
8 638 0.4 0.4 530 76 0.92 0.22
9 585 0.49 0.54 428 37 0.94 0.14
10 568 0.46 0.47 488 55 0.95 0.18
11 607 0.23 0.28 313 73 0.91 0.33
12 577 0.41 0.42 473 74 0.94 0.25
13 347 0.37 0.4 256 12 0.92 0.08
14 382 0.28 0.33 225 31 0.94 0.2
15 441 0.44 0.54 253 37 0.95 0.23
16 411 0.39 0.42 296 45 0.91 0.23
17 365 0.51 0.57 269 52 0.91 0.28
18 213 0.17 0.25 65 12 0.83 0.26
19 446 0.28 0.32 241 36 0.89 0.22
20 255 0.54 0.58 203 24 0.88 0.18
21 159 0.57 0.67 106 15 0.93 0.22
22 287 0.23 0.35 72 17 1 0.38
X 309 0.59 0.62 267 22 0.91 0.14
Y 27 0.6 0.52 34 2 1 0.11