Table 1.
Author (Date) | Study Design | Muscle; Biopsy Type | Measure of Muscle Strength | Sample (n) | Results |
Comments | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type I Fibres | Type II Fibres | Other Microscopic Changes | ||||||
Adeniyi (2004)55 | Single case report | Quadriceps; type of biopsy not indicated | Clinical assessment of muscle strength (measures not reported); report of difficulty rising from the chair | HD=1 | Scattered atrophic fibres | Scattered atrophic fibres | Type I and II fibres equally involved, consistent with neuropathic myopathy | Reports do not support myopathy as a primary cause of weakness. |
Ahonen (1980)36 | Case-control | Gastrocnemius (medial head); open muscle biopsy | Implicit suggestions of muscle weakness based on prior published reports of myopathy in people with ESRD/HD | HD=11 Con=9 |
Diameter of type I fibres slightly larger than reference group (type I hypertrophy) (p>0.01) |
|
|
|
Bautista (1983)56 | Case series | Deltoid; method of biopsy not indicated | Clinical evaluation demonstrated proximal muscle weakness (measures not reported) | HD=10 |
|
|
|
Myofibrillar changes suggestive of myopathic factors contributing to muscular weakness |
Crowe (2007)26 | Case-control | Quadriceps femoris (lateral); percutaneous needle biopsy | Implicit suggestions of muscle weakness based on prior published reports of limited exercise capacity contributing to poor quality of life | HD=10 Con=10 |
Fibre diameter reduced by 15% (p=0.04) | Fibre diameter reduced by 20% (p=0.03) | No difference in proportion of type I and II fibres compared to Con (p=0.9) |
|
Diesel (1993)27 | Case-control | Vastus lateralis; open muscle biopsy |
|
HD=8 Athl=7 Con=5 |
Hypertrophy of type I fibres (n=2) |
|
|
|
Fahal (1997)37 | Case-control | Quadriceps femoris (lateral); percutaneous conchotome biopsy |
|
HD=12 Con=10 |
|
|
|
|
Floyd (1974)15 | Case-control | Quadriceps or biceps; open muscle biopsy | Clinical assessment of strength (measures not reported) | HD=10 Non- dialyzed=4 |
Variation in muscle fibre size was outside normal limits in the majority of the cases | Type II fibre atrophy in each case |
|
Results support myopathic changes associated with renal failure as possible cause of muscular weakness. |
Giovenali (1994)53 | Case series | Vastus lateralis; open muscle biopsy |
|
HD=26 | Atrophy of type I fibres | Atrophy of type II fibres | N/A | The main objective of the study was to assess the effect of L-carnitine on muscle strength. The baseline data were included. |
Kouidi (1998)9 | Case series | Vastus lateralis; open muscle biopsy | MVC using dynamometer | HD=7 | Changes in HD:
|
|
|
|
Lazaro (1980)16 | Case series | Quadriceps femoris; open muscle biopsy | Clinical assessment of strength (measures not reported), participant reports of gait abnormalities such as waddling gait or difficulty walking, difficulty rising from chair | HD=4 | No comment on changes in type I fibres |
|
|
|
Moore (1993)57 | Case series | Rectus femoris; percutaneous needle biopsy | Implicit suggestions of muscle weakness based on prior published reports of uremic myopathy | HD=11 | Numerous atrophic type I fibres | Numerous atrophic type II fibres | Variability in type I and type II fibres was large | Peripheral factors contributing to skeletal muscle weakness |
Molsted (2007)31 | Case-control | Vastus lateralis; open muscle biopsy |
|
HD=14 Con=12 |
Several patients on HD had <15% type I fibres p<0.001 | More of type IIx fibres | N/A |
|
Sakkas (2003)58 | Case series | Medial head of gastrocnemius; percutaneous muscle biopsy using conchotome technique | Implicit suggestions of muscle weakness based on prior published reports of reduced exercise capacity in people on HD | HD=12 | Dominance of type I fibres | Type IIa fibres dominant in the distribution of type II fibres | Proportion of fibres with central nuclei within the normal range |
|
Sakkas (2004)4 | Case series | Medial head of gastrocnemius; percutaneous muscle biopsy using conchotome technique | Implicit suggestions of muscle weakness based on prior published reports of uremic myopathy | HD=12 | No data | No significant difference between mean CSA of type IIa and IIx fibres | No data |
|
Shah (1983)49 | Case-control | Quadriceps; method of biopsy not indicated | Complaints of proximal muscle weakness in all participants | HD=10 Con=8 |
Atrophy of type I fibres | Preferential atrophy of type II fibres | Abundant lipid droplets in type I and II fibres |
|
van den Ham (2007)34 | Case-control | Vastus lateralis; needle biopsy techniques | MVC using dynamometry HD=Reduced MVC |
HD=14 Con=18 |
Similar to that of Con group | Similar to Con group | N/A | Physical inactivity in people on HD contributes to muscle weakness. |
Athl=athletes; CAPD=continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; Con=control group; CSA=cross-sectional area; HD=haemodialysis; MVC=maximim voluntary contraction; N/A=not applicable