Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 9;68(9):631–640. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100155

Table 4.

Results of sensitivity analyses on ORs for glioma and meningioma with radio frequency exposure in the highest quintile of total cumulative specific energy (TCSE)

Factors included in sensitivity analyses Glioma Meningioma
Cases Controls OR (95% CI) Cases Controls OR (95% CI)
All subjects with tumour localisation
 TCSE at centre of tumour
  Estimated by neuroradiologists when available, predicted by computer algorithm otherwise—main analysis 103 207 1.35 (0.96 to 1.90) 88 251 0.90 (0.66 to 1.24)
  Predicted by computer algorithm for all subjects 99 206 1.32 (0.93 to 1.86) 93 253 0.93 (0.68 to 1.27)
  Estimated by neuroradiologists when available, predicted by computer algorithm otherwise not taking account of tumour laterality 105 241 1.23 (0.89 to 1.72) 94 288 0.84 (0.62 to 1.15)
 TCSE averaged over the entire tumour
  Taking into account reported tumour laterality 107 224 1.28 (0.92 to 1.80) 93 253 0.92 (0.69 to 1.24)
  Not taking into account tumour laterality 111 254 1.21 (0.87 to 1.68) 94 291 0.84 (0.61 to 1.15)
 Effect of exclusion of
  Subjects with very high reported use (>5 h/day) 93 188 1.34 (0.94 to 1.91) 81 235 0.91 (0.66 to 1.26)
  Subjects with proxy response 94 207 1.43 (0.99 to 2.05) 87 249 0.93 (0.68 to 1.27)
  Subjects reporting use of 450 MHz telephones 101 202 1.35 (0.96 to 1.91) 88 246 0.92 (0.67 to 1.26)
  Never regular users (using the lowest quintile of TCSE as reference category) 103 195 1.93 (1.26 to 2.96) 88 237 1.04 (0.71 to 1.53)
 By frequency band
  800–900 MHz 100 197 1.36 (0.96 to 1.93) 88 240 1.35 (0.74 to 2.44)
  1800–1900 MHz 22 57 1.45* (0.80 to 2.63) 6 59 0.28 (0.10 to 0.79)
 By communication system
  Analogue 43 82 1.22 (0.77 to 1.92) 27 109 1.29 (0.71 to 2.34)
  Digital 79 194 1.22 (0.84 to 1.76) 87 214 0.87 (0.45 to 1.67)
Only subjects with centre estimated by neuroradiologists
 Using centre estimated by neuroradiologist 57 86 1.66 (1.03 to 2.67) 35 114 1.01 (0.63 to 1.62)
 Using centre predicted by computer algorithm for all subjects 53 85 1.58 (0.98 to 2.57) 39 118 1.02 (0.64 to 1.61)
Only subjects for whom images were available (ie, excluding Israel) 70 109 1.82 (1.20 to 2.76) 33 113 1.23 (0.76 to 2.00)
Country-specific estimates
 Australia 30 49 1.15 (0.56 to 2.38) 19 67 0.75 (0.38 to 1.48)
 Canada 21 27 3.48 (1.63 to 7.43) 7 33 1.51 (0.58 to 3.93)
 France 11 29 1.39 (0.56 to 3.49) 7 29 0.77 (0.30 to 1.98)
 Israel 33 98 0.74 (0.40 to 1.37) 50 116 0.74 (0.47 to 1.17)
 New Zealand 8 4 3.69 (0.78 to 17.5) 5 6 5.52 (0.98 to 31.2)
Sex-specific estimates
 Men 85 133 1.33 (0.87 to 2.03) 41 151 0.98 (0.58 to 1.65)
 Women 18 74 1.30 (0.69 to 2.47) 47 100 0.88 (0.58 to 1.34)
*

OR in fourth quintile: 1.86, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.22 (29 cases and 54 controls).