Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 19.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Neurol. 2011 Jan;10(1):63–74. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70253-2

Figure 3. Treatment and outcome in 105 patients comparing presence and absence of tumour and the use of second-line immunotherapy.

Figure 3

First-line immunotherapy consists of corticosteroids, IVIg and plasma exchange given alone or in combination (detailed below). *Second-line immunotherapy, consists of rituximab or cyclophosphamide, or both. Substantial improvement is defined as previously reported,8 and includes full recovery or minimum deficits estimated by physicians and family members as recovery of more than 90% of function. All other patients are judged to have little improvement or no change. In patients with tumour, first-line treatment indicates tumour removal and in most cases first-line immunotherapy. Although there was no difference between the proportion of patients who achieved substantial recovery with or without tumour (Fisher’s exact test, p=0·16), patients with tumour responded to first-line treatment more often than did patients without tumour (p=0·001). Those without tumour required second-line immunotherapy more often and the 5 patients who died were in this group. Whether these patients had occult tumours is unknown.