Table 2.
Author | Year | Phase | Investigational drug | n | RR | DS | PFS/TTP | PFS-6m (%) | OS |
Sun et al[76] | 2007 | II | Bevacizumab/CapOx | 30 | 11 | 78 | 4.5/NR | 40 | NR |
Thomas et al[55] | 2009 | II | Bevacizumab/erlotinib | 40 | 25 | 42.5 | 9.0/NR | NR | 15.7 |
Hsu et al[77] | 2008 | II | Bevacizumab/capecitabine | 45 | 9 | 42 | 4.1/NR | NR | 10.7 |
Zhu et al[78] | 2006 | II | Bevacizumab/GemOX | 33 | 20 | 27 | 5.3/NR | NR | 9.6 |
Berlin et al[79] | 2008 | II | Bortezomib/doxorubicin | 39 | 2.3 | 25.6 | 2.4/NR | NR | 5.7 |
Asnacios et al[80]1 | 2008 | II | Cetuximab/GemOx | 45 | 20 | 40 | 4.7/NR | NR | 9.5 |
Louafi et al[81]1 | 2007 | II | Cetuximab/GemOx | 35 | 24 | 4.5 | NR/NR | 40 | 9.2 |
Knox et al[82]2 | 2008 | II | G3139/doxorubicin | 17 | 0 | 35 | NR/1.8 | 17.2 | 5.4 |
Abou-Alfa et al[83]3 | 2010 | II | Sorafenib/doxorubicin | 96 | 4 | 77 | 6.9/8.6 | 2.7 | 13.7 |
Richly et al[84] | 2009 | I | Sorafenib/doxorubicin | 18 | 6.3 | 69 | 4.04/NR | NR | NR |
1Overlap of patient cohorts cannot be excluded from information provided in the abstracts; 2Trial stopped due to lack of efficacy; 3Trial stopped due to superiority of sorafenib;
Calculated from a median duration of disease control rate (combined endpoint for complete and partial response as well as stable disease) of 17.4 wk. CapOx: Capecitabine and oxaliplatin; DS: Disease stabilization (%); GemOx: Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin; NR: Not reported; OS: Overall survival (mo); PFS/TTP: Progression free survival/time to progression (mo); PFS-6m: Progression free survival rate at 6 mo (%); RR: Response rate [complete + partial response (%)].