Table 1.
Criteria | Yes | No |
---|---|---|
Description of competitive alternative | 10 | 2 |
Well defined questions in answerable form | 12 | 0 |
Economic evaluation study design appropriately | 11 | 1 |
Time horizon | 12 | 0 |
Perspective | 11 | 1 |
All cost item included | 9 | 3 |
All cost measured appropriately | 9 | 3 |
All costs valued properly | 12 | 0 |
Base year of cost data stated | 9 | 3 |
Sources of cost data included | 11 | 1 |
Sources of outcome data included | 9 | 3 |
ICER done | 2 | 10 |
Cost discounted | 3 | 9 |
Outcome discounted | 2 | 10 |
Sensitivity analysis done | 6 | 6 |
Conclusion follow from the data reported | 12 | 0 |
Discussed about generasilibity | 3 | 9 |
Ethical issue discussed | 4 | 8 |
Affordability discussed | 1 | 11 |