Table 5.
Intervention males | Control males | Adjusted p value | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5th BL | 5th FU | 6th BL | 6th FU | 5th BL | 5th FU | 6th BL | 6th FU | ||
n =141 | n =129 | n =168 | n =122 | n =121 | n =110 | n =137 | n =133 | ||
Favors abstinence | 64.3 (29.7) | 57.4 (30.7) | 53.8 (28.2) | 50.1 (28.6) | 67.3 (26.3) | 60.4 (27.4) | 54.0 (25.8) | 48.4 (27.0) | 0.404 |
Perceives abstinence as peer norm | 69.0 (24.6) | 63.6 (30.0) | 61.3 (25.7) | 57.8 (24.8) | 69.7 (25.6) | 66.0 (26.1) | 63.3 (24.8) | 57.0 (24.0) | 0.163 |
Communicates with parents | 46.8 (31.0) | 52.2 (30.0) | 46.8 (30.1) | 46.0 (27.5) | 44.7 (28.2) | 47.8 (29.0) | 48.8 (30.7) | 45.9 (28.5) | 0.861 |
Identifies peer pressure to have sex | 77.2 (28.5) | 75.0 (31.4) | 77.7 (27.8) | 69.5 (33.1) | 71.7 (31.0) | 68.8 (32.6) | 75.4 (31.0) | 69.9 (30.0) | 0.299 |
Favors use of refusal skills | 67.9 (26.7) | 64.4 (27.3) | 61.4 (26.0) | 55.5 (25.9) | 66.7 (27.8) | 67.2 (28.3) | 61.3 (26.4) | 55.0 (27.1) | 0.758 |
Benefits of postponing sex | 3.0 (2.2) | 3.9 (2.5) | 3.2 (2.2) | 3.9 (2.2) | 3.1 (2.4) | 3.8 (2.4) | 3.2 (2.2) | 3.3 (2.3) | 0.293 |
Consequences of having baby in school | 0.1 (1.1) | 0.5 (1.2) | 0.2 (1.1) | 0.4 (1.1) | 0.2 (1.2) | 0.4 (1.2) | 0.3 (0.9) | 0.5 (1.0) | 0.387 |
Influences on kids to have sex | 2.1 (1.7) | 2.2 (1.8) | 2.2 (1.6) | 2.4 (1.7) | 1.9 (1.7) | 2.3 (1.8) | 2.1 (1.5) | 2.2 (1.8) | 0.635 |
Knowledge of self/boys’ puberty | 3.6 (2.6) | 6.4 (2.2) | 5.3 (2.7) | 6.9 (2.0) | 3.9 (2.8) | 5.6 (2.5) | 5.4 (2.5) | 6.2 (2.5) | 0.068** |
Knowledge of girls’ puberty | 3.1 (2.8) | 5.8 (2.8) | 5.0 (3.0) | 6.5 (2.6) | 3.7 (3.1) | 5.1 (3.0) | 4.9 (2.7) | 5.6 (2.9) | 0.045* |
Notes: The means and standard deviations are the unadjusted values; the p-value is the result of the test of significance for the variable, time × membership in intervention or control group, in the linear hierarchical model. BL =baseline; FU =follow-up.
p < 0.10.
p < 0.05.