Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 19.
Published in final edited form as: Sex Educ. 2011 Feb;11(1):27–46. doi: 10.1080/14681811.2011.538146

Table 6.

Secondary outcome results for female fifth-grade and sixth-grade students, mean scores (and standard deviations); adjusted p values from models.

Intervention females Control females Adjusted p value

5th BL 5th FU 6th BL 6th FU 5th BL 5th FU 6th BL 6th FU

n =146 n =138 n =185 n =159 n =148 n =125 n =131 n =147
Favors abstinence 73.6 (21.1) 76.5 (18.0) 72.8 (22.1) 66.3 (25.3) 73.2 (22.9) 73.2 (23.0) 69.9 (23.3) 65.3 (22.1) 0.427
Perceives abstinence as peer norm 83.2 (17.1) 85.8 (15.9) 86.1 (15.8) 82.6 (16.1) 84.7 (16.3) 84.8 (17.8) 86.8 (15.5) 83.4 (19.3) 0.242
Communicates with parents 59.4 (30.4) 68.7 (27.4) 63.5 (28.3) 61.1 (29.0) 63.5 (32.1) 62.8 (31.2) 64.7 (30.0) 63.8 (30.1) 0.523
Identifies peer pressure to have sex 80.2 (29.9) 76.3 (32.4) 77.2 (30.9) 74.5 (30.6) 78.6 (30.5) 75.2 (32.3) 69.6 (35.4) 72.5 (35.0) 0.452
Favors use of refusal skills 87.6 (19.2) 88.8 (16.0) 88.0 (15.4) 87.68 (14.9) 86.1 (17.3) 87.4 (18.0) 88.9 (14.2) 85.2 (17.7) 0.785
Benefits of postponing sex 4.0 (2.5) 5.0 (2.1) 4.9 (2.1) 5.2 (1.9) 4.0 (2.6) 4.9 (2.2) 4.5 (2.4) 4.7 (2.2) 0.062*
Consequences of having baby in school 0.7 (0.9) 1.2 (0.9) 0.9 (1.0) 1.1 (1.0) 0.5 (1.0) 0.9 (0.9) 0.9 (1.0) 1.0 (1.0) 0.381
Influences on kids to have sex 2.4 (1.7) 2.9 (1.7) 2.9 (1.7) 3.2 (1.7) 2.6 (1.8) 2.8 (1.8) 2.9 (1.7) 3.0 (1.7) 0.082*
Knowledge of self/girls’ puberty 5.3 (2.8) 7.5 (2.0) 7.2 (2.0) 8.0 (1.5) 5.4 (2.9) 6.9 (2.2) 7.0 (1.9) 7.2 (2.1) 0.021**
Knowledge of boys’ puberty 3.8 (2.8) 6.4 (2.9) 6.0 (2.9) 7.3 (2.1) 3.2 (3.0) 5.0 (3.0) 5.5 (2.7) 6.0 (2.8) 0.011**

Notes: The means and standard deviations are the unadjusted values; the p-value is the result of the test of significance for the variable, time × membership in intervention or control group, in the linear hierarchical model. BL =baseline; FU =follow-up.

*

p < 0.10.

**

p < 0.05.