Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 27;108(3):537–545. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr169

Table 3.

Mean values of root tensile strength and root diameter, a and b values and adjusted r2 values of the power law eqn (1), expressing the decrease in tensile strength with increasing root diameter of the 13 analysed species in the order of their a value

Species Mean tensile strength (N mm−2) Mean root diameter (mm) a b n Adjusted r2
Geum reptans 7·68 (0·29) 0·90 (0·06) 7·00 –0·31 41 0·32***
Luzula spicata 30·25 (2·32) 0·16 (0·01) 5·91 –0·78 35 0·43***
Trifolium badium 7·62 (0·52) 0·78 (0·06) 5·68 –0·60 41 0·60***
Luzula alpinopilosa 18·52 (4·03) 0·37 (0·04) 5·44 –0·93 17 0·57***
Salix herbacea 6·10 (0·41) 0·92 (0·07) 5·39 –0·24 35 NS
Poa alpina 27·91 (3·88) 0·30 (0·03) 4·92 –1·17 21 0·72***
Campanula scheuchzeri 3·78 (1·24) 2·08 (0·25) 3·98 –0·36 6 NS
Leucanthemopsis alpina 4·26 (0·25) 0·83 (0·03) 3·81 –0·26 31 NS
Ranunculus glacialis 2·74 (0·16) 1·53 (0·08) 2·93 –0·33 30 0·09*
Veronica alpina 6·76 (0·90) 0·41 (0·02) 2·92 –0·71 40 0·26***
Trisetum spicatum 27·49 (2·47) 0·24 (0·02) 2·61 –1·38 50 0·79***
Arabis caerulea 2·01 (0·20) 2·50 (0·23) 2·42 –0·28 11 NS
Salix breviserrata NA NA NA NA NA NA

n is the number of roots tested. Values are means with s.e.m. in parentheses. ***P < 0·001, **P < 0·01, *P < 0·05; NS, not significant; NA, not available.