Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 16.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2011 Aug 1;124(7):789–795. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.010710

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Generalized Least Squares (GLST) Regression Spline (Smoothed Fit) Models with 95% Confidence Intervals
Relative Risk of CHD by Kcal/wk of LTPA, GLST Spline Regression
Men Women
Kcal/wk* Relative Risk (95% CI) Kcal/wk Relative Risk (95% CI)
600 vs.0 0.91 (0.79, 1.04) 5001 vs.0 0.80 (0.69, 0.92)
1200 vs.0 0.82 (0.74, 0.91) 10002 vs.0 0.72 (0.63, 0.83)
2400 vs.0 0.81 (0.73, 0.90) 2000 vs.0 0.77 (0.63, 0.93)
3000 vs.0 0.79 (0.73, 0.86) 2500 vs.0 0.52 (0.40, 0.67)
*
Please refer to Figure 2 footnotes for explanation on physical activity categories.