Table 2.
Studies reporting negative prognostic value of HER2 protein expression or gene amplification in urothelial carcinoma
| Author/reference | Correlative outcome/HER2 marker | Patients/Cases |
|---|---|---|
| Chakravarti et al [61] | lower complete response rate to chemoradiation / protein expression | 73 |
| Lönn et al [63] | aneuploidy, higher grade, shorter overall survival / protein expression | 91 |
| Lipponen et al [62] | higher stage and grade, shorter overall survival / gene amplification | 178 |
| Masliukova et al [68] | shorter relapse-free survival/ protein expression / protein expression | 63 |
| Kolla et al [69] | higher stage and grade, positive lymph node status, shorter disease-free and disease-related survival / protein expression | 90 |
| Krüger et al [70] | higher grade, shorter disease-free and disease-related survival / protein expression | 138 |
| Tsai et al [71] | site (bladder vs upper urinary tract), shorter progression-free and disease-related survival / protein expression | 114 |
| Skagias et al [72] | higher stage, grade, shorter disease-specific and overall survival / protein expression | 80 |
| Bolenz et al [73] | lymph nodes (vs primary site), lymphovascular invasion, higher recurrence risk, shorter disease-specific survival / protein expression | 198 |
| Alexa et al [74] | higher grade/ protein expression | 59 |