Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Nov 20;85(2):194–200. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.005

Table 2.

Variation in standardized patients’ (SP) general communication, affective demeanor, and reality ratings***.

Lowest mean
SP score ± SD
Highest mean
SP score ± SD
F-statistic p-Value Effect size
(Cohen’s f)
SP general communication (mean use of each category as a percentage of total talk) Clinical information-giving 39% ± 4% 50% ± 4% 2.03 0.0789 0.18
Psychosocial information-giving 22% ± 2% 28% ± 1% 1.37 0.2543 0.11
Question-asking 2% ± 0.4% 5% ± 0.4% 5.64 0.0001 0.40
Social Talk 6% ± 2% 14% ± 2% 11.74 <0.0001 0.57
Emotional talk and partnership building 11% ± 1% 15% ± 1% 2.96 0.0144 0.25
Facilitative talk 0.8% ± 0.2% 4% ± 0.2% 20.63 <0.0001 0.83
Verbal activity level (SP talk/GC talk) 0.21 ± 0.02 0.26 ± 0.02 0.95 0.4495 0.08
SP affective demeanor Anxietya 1.4 ± 0.2 2.4 ± 0.2 11.40 <0.0001 0.56
Warmthb 2.8 ± 0.1 3.4 ± 0.1 3.61 0.0043 0.29
Reality ratingc    2.8 ± 0.3 3.3 ± 0.3 1.22 0.3025 0.08
a

Rating on a 6 point scale, with higher values indicating higher levels of anxiety.

b

Rating on a 6 point scale, with higher values indicating higher levels of warmth.

c

Rating on a 4 point scale, with ‘4’ indicating “completely real”.

***

Analyses based on ANOVA with case and presence of spouse as covariates with 7 degrees of freedom.