Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 21.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2004 Fall;16(4):985–1006. doi: 10.1017/s0954579404040106

Table 2.

Pathways of interest in LTM predicting young adult coping

Time 4 Outcome Variables
Active Coping
Avoidant Coping
Cognitive Coping
Predictor Variables β Z β Z β Z
Age −.05 −0.40 −.08 −0.64 −.04 −0.26
Gender .07 0.82 −.08 −0.98 .18 1.60
COA −.13 −1.79 .03 0.43 −.06 −0.73
LTM
 Intercept cognitive coping −.03 −0.35 .26 3.35*** .08 0.91
 Slope cognitive coping .10 0.46 .26 1.28 .32 1.08
 Intercept planning coping .36 4.50*** −.27 −3.59*** .16 1.68
 Slope planning coping .31 1.46 −.04 −0.20 .21 0.77
Time 3
 Major life stress .12 1.57 .03 0.42 .03 0.28
 Substance use .03 0.36 −.01 −0.08 −.01 −0.04

Note: Betas are standardized estimates.

The Z values are significant at

p < .10 and

***

p < .001.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure