Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 8;28(3):Doc38. doi: 10.3205/zma000750

Figure 2. Evaluation of k-MED learning modules in the clinical study period. Figure 2a shows the combined evaluation data of winter term 05/06 and spring term 06 (examinees: 454, return questionnaires: 322 = 71 %. Figure 2b gives the respective results of winter term 06/07 and spring term 07 (examinees: 306, return questionnaires: 249 = 81 %). The evaluation of the learning scenario in spring term 09 supplied similar ratings (not so good: 12 %, good: 56 %, very good: 32 %) among 126 examinees and 75 % return questionnaires.

Figure 2