Skip to main content
. 2009 May 28;170(2):237–243. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp136

Table 4.

Bladder Cancer Odds Ratio and 95% Confidence Interval for Different Etiologic Factors, Adjusted for Smoking Status, Area, Sex, Age, and a Component for Random Interviewer Effects, Among All Study Subjects and by Overall Quality of Interview, Spain, June 1998–June 2001

Occupation
All Subjects (N  =  2,315)
Unsatisfactory/Questionable Interviews (n  = 186)
Reliable/High Quality Interviews (n  = 2,129)
Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval
Non-high risk 1.00 1.00 1.00
High risk 1.51 1.21, 1.89 1.47 0.66, 3.29 1.52 1.21, 1.92
Average Residential Trihalomethane Levels
All Subjects (N  = 1,536)
Unsatisfactory/Questionable Interviews (n  = 91)
Reliable/High Quality Interviews (n  = 1,445)
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval
≤26 μg/L 1.00 1.00 1.00
>26 μg/L 1.76 1.25, 2.46 1.34 0.29, 6.28 1.82 1.28, 2.58
Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs
All Subjects (N  = 1,749)
Unsatisfactory/Questionable Interviews (n  = 115)
Reliable/High Quality Interviews (n  = 1.634)
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval
Never 1.00 1.00 1.00
Long-term users 0.49 0.23, 1.03 1.07 0.06, 18.98 0.45 0.21, 0.98