Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 23;174(1):99–108. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr045

Table 5.

Sensitivity Analysis for Controlled Direct Effects Under Unmeasured Moderate and Substantial Confounding, US Singleton Births, 1995–2002a

Perinatal Mortality Observed Analysis (No Unmeasured Confounding)
Moderate Unmeasured Confounding (RRU = 1.5)
Severe Unmeasured Confounding (RRU = 6.0)
Preterm = No
Preterm = Yes
Preterm = Nob
Preterm = Yes
Preterm = Nob
Preterm = Yes
RRCDE 95% CI RRCDE 95% CI RRCDE 95% CI RRCDE 95% CI RRCDE 95% CI RRCDE 95% CI
Stillbirth 29.31 27.98, 30.70 3.81 3.51, 4.14 29.31 27.98, 30.70 4.54 4.18, 4.92 29.31 27.98, 30.70 9.23 8.51, 10.02
Early neonatal 10.94 9.93, 12.06 2.65 2.40, 2.92 10.94 9.93, 12.06 3.15 2.86, 3.48 10.94 9.93, 12.06 6.41 5.81, 7.08
Late neonatal 3.95 3.29, 4.75 2.56 2.13, 3.08 3.95 3.29, 4.75 3.05 2.53, 3.67 3.95 3.29, 4.75 6.20 5.15, 7.45
Perinatal mortality 22.31 21.41, 23.26 3.32 3.18, 3.46 22.31 21.41, 23.26 3.95 3.18, 3.46 22.31 21.41, 23.26 8.04 7.70, 8.39

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; RRCDE, the adjusted risk ratio for controlled direct effects; RU, the effect if unmeasured confounding increased the likelihood of the mortality outcome by a factor of 1.5 or 6.

a

Risk ratios were adjusted for maternal age, liveborn parity, marital status, maternal race, smoking during pregnancy, and chronic hypertension through log-binomial regression models.

b

Under the simplifying assumptions that the prevalence of U among term deliveries was 5% both with and without abruption, the controlled direct effect at term (i.e., mediator absent) is unaffected. Note, however, that this would change if the prevalence of U among term pregnancies were assumed to be different with and without abruption.