Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 31.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2011 Jun 1;224(2):259–271. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.05.030

Table 3.

Ethanol effects on 8 tests: Correlations between means of 20 inbred strains a

BB
(1.25)
FSRR
(1.25)
ARR
(1.25)
FSRR
(1.75)
ARR
(1.75)
ACT
(1.75)
GRIP
(1.75)
ORA
(3.0)
FSRR (1.25) 0.03
ARR (1.25) 0.53 0.13
FSRR (1.75) 0.53 0.56 0.33
ARR (1.75) 0.52 0.26 0.66 0.67
ACT (1.75) −0.14 −0.07 0.36 −0.21 0.05
GRIP (1.75) 0.28 −0.06 −0.27 0.48 0.08 −0.32
ORA (3.0) 0.14 0.08 −0.09 0.17 0.00 −0.28 0.35
HTT (3.0) 0.11 0.50 −.00 0.00 0.22 −0.08 0.28 0.06
a

Ethanol dosage for each test is given in parentheses. For all but one test done at 1.25 or 1.75 g/kg, the strain mean is the difference between means of independent groups receiving ethanol or saline injections, whereas all mice received the 3.0 g/kg dose and effects were compared with baseline scores. For BB at 1.25 g/kg, means are based only on the ethanol condition because foot slip rates under saline were very low for all mice. Correlations 0.5 or greater are shown in bold. Task abbreviations are given in Table 1.