Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 31.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2011 Jun 17;224(2):311–317. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.06.009

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Latencies to locate the platform on the working memory paradigm of the Morris water maze. Overall, the sham group took less time than the vehicle and NAM group to reach the platform. On the third day of testing (day 21) the NAM group had significantly improved latencies compared to the vehicle group (* = p < 0.05). In addition, the NAM group was not significantly different from the sham group on day 19 or 20 (+ = ns).