Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 23.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Chem. 2010 Apr 1;56(6):1007–1014. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.141754

Table 1.

Assay imprecision around the 4 µg/L screening cutoff for Immunalysis Sweat/Oral Fluid Δ9-THC Direct ELISA.

Intraplate (n = 5), % Interplate (n = 20), % Interreada (n = 5), %



Control level
(µg/L THC)
Mean (SD)
B/B0b
CV Mean
B/B0
CV Mean
B/B0
CV
1 56.4 (1.6) 2.9 60.3 (1.8) 3.0 56.6 (0.3) 0.5

3 37.2 (2.9) 7.7 38.5 (2.0) 5.1 37.4 (0.3) 0.9

5 30.0 (1.1) 3.6 30.6 (2.8) 9.1 30.1 (0.2) 0.8

6 27.1 (2.0) 7.4 27.8 (1.3) 4.7 27.3 (0.2) 0.9
a

Variation in absorbance after addition of stop solution.

b

Raw absorbance values (B) normalized to the mean negative control absorbance value (B0).