TABLE 2.
Evaluation of border detection methods
| References | Year | # Experts |
# Images (distribution) |
Error measure (value) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (13) | 2009 | 1 | 100 (70 b/30 m) | Sensitivity (78%) and Specificity (99%) |
| (19) | 2008 | 3 | 90 (65 b/25 m) | XOR (10.63%) |
| (20) | 2008 | 1 | 67 | XOR (14.63%) |
| (21) | 2008 | 1 | 100 (70 b/30 m) | XOR (2.73%) |
| (24) | 2007 | 1 | 50 | Error probability (16%) |
| (24) | 2007 | 1 | 50 | Error probability (21%) |
| (18) | 2007 | 2 | 100 (70 b/30 m) | XOR (12.02%) |
| (15) | 2006 | 5 | 319 (244 b/75 m) | Precision (94.1%) and Recall (95.2%) |
| (17) | 2006 | NR | 117 | Sensitivity (95%) and Specificity (96%) |
| (14) | 2005 | 2 | 100 (70 b/30 m) | XOR (15.59%) |
| (25) | 2003 | 0 | NR | NR |
| (12) | 2002 | 0 | 600 | Visual |
| (26) | 2001 | 0 | NR | NR |
| (27) | 2000 | 5 | 30 | Visual |
| (28) | 2000 | 1 | 30 | Visual |
| (11) | 1999 | 1 | 400 | Visual |
| (29) | 1999 | 1 | 300 | Visual |
| (30) | 1998 | 1 | 57 | XOR (36.50%) |
| (30) | 1998 | 1 | 57 | XOR (24.71%) |
b, benign; m, melanoma; XOR, exclusive-OR.