Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug;179(2):547–554. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.05.010

Table 1.

Outcomes for Image Analysis of the Unstained Specimen and of Images Segmented by the Different Transforms and Algorithms

Outcome Unstained specimen RVM2 DCA RVM3 DCA RVM2 β-NTF RVM3 β-NTF RVM2 HALS NMF RVM3 HALS NMF RVM2 NMU-ℓ1 RVM3 NMU-ℓ1
Sciatic nerve fiber (nervus ischiadicus)
 NTP 55/55 50/51 52/51 48/48 53/55 50/49 54/54 48/49 58/58
 NFN 0/0 4/4 4/2 5/5 2/1 5/55 1/2 4/4 1/1
 NFP 27/27 11/11 30/32 20/19 42/40 20/22 20/19 27/25 29/30
Spleen tissue
 NTP 128/131 128/131 126/121 128/131 Failed 128/131 Failed 128/131 118/117
 NFN 0/0 3/7 3/5 3/6 Failed 5/5 Failed 5/8 2/1
 NFP 55/47 41/48 24/23 24/33 Failed 31/25 Failed 29/35 17/19

Results obtained independently by two pathologists are separated by a virgule mark.

Transforms: RVM2 and RVM3 (second-order and third-order rational variety mapping). Algorithms: DCA (dependent component analysis), β-NTF (β-divergence non-negative tensor factorization), HALS NMF (hierarchical alternating least-square non-negative matrix factorization), and NMU-ℓ1 (non-negative matrix underapproximation).

NFN, number of false negatives; NFP, number of false positives; NTP, number of true positives.