Table 1. Single predictor variable analysis of relative effectiveness (RE)a.
Predictor variable | Log RE | SE | T | d.f. | P | |
Combined intervention | None | 0 | ||||
Chemical | −1.362 | 0.823 | 1.65 | 19 | 0.114 | |
Other | −0.220 | 0.834 | 1.59 | 19 | 0.795 | |
Combined intervention with Chemical | No | 0 | ||||
Yes but chemical spraying also applied to controls | 0.039 | 0.563 | 0.07 | 19 | 0.945 | |
Yes and chemical spraying not applied to controls | −2.079 | 0.775 | 2.68 | 19 | 0.015 | |
Study design | Historical control | 0 | ||||
Contemporary control | 2.076 | 0.648 | 3.20 | 20 | 0.0045 | |
Any intervention in controls | No | 0 | ||||
Yes | 0.645 | 0.823 | 0.78 | 20 | 0.442 | |
Any intervention in controls, excluding historic controls | No | 0 | ||||
Yes | −0.045 | 0.368 | 0.12 | 14 | 0.904 | |
Time at follow-up/m | −0.081 | 0.042 | 1.93 | 17 | 0.071 | |
Log time at follow-up/m | −1.135 | 0.593 | 1.91 | 17 | 0.073 |
Note that negative Log RE is associated with greater reduction in entomological indices in the intervention.