Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Apr 13;218(1):191–201. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2285-5

Table 1.

Effects of alcohol on the expression of FPS

Treatment Group Saline 0.5 g/kg EtOH 1.0 g/kg EtOH 1.5 g/kg EtOH
HAP1 Male Fear 81.5±22.2 56.0±15.5 69.7±19.4 33.3±13.8a
HAP1 Male Control 12.1±6.4 7.4±11.2 23.7±12.6 13.4±15.9
LAP1 Male Fear 40.4±15.0 12.1±8.4 27.9±9.7 18.8±11.6
LAP1 Male Control 19.0±9.3 9.5±9.2 12.7±7.5 23.8±9.9
HAP1 Female Fear 75.7±18.8 62.4±25.5 60.8±28.4 23.9±12.7a
HAP1 Female Control 10.9±11.2 18.4±11.1 39.7±16.8 11.5±10.9
LAP1 Female Fear 22.1±9.2 34.2±8.0 29.9±9.0 27.1±10.5
LAP1 Female Control 5.9±9.7 −1.2±6.8 10.6±11.7 −1.2±9.8
HAP2 Male Fear 82.6±15.2 70.4±11.9 32.4±8.6 52.7±13.2a
HAP2 Male Control −6.1 ±5.8 2.5±8.9 3.4±7.3 16.7±7.5
LAP2 Male Fear 44.9±13.9 33.9±12.1 33.3±10.9 68.1±24.8
LAP2 Male Control 0.2±8.4 29.0±8.9 1.7±7.4 −6.1±5.3
HAP2 Female Fear 39.0±10.2 38.3±8.6 54.5±8.1 42.0±12.1a
HAP2 Female Control −2.5±6.1 −13.3±5.2 −0.1±5.7 6.2±6.8
LAP2 Female Fear 19.1±8.4 27.2±7.2 19.6±8.7 7.1±7.3
LAP2 Female Control −6.5±6.2 −9.4±8.3 12.6±9.6 −2.8±5.6

Mean (± SEM) % FPS data from Fig. 1 separately show the replicate lines 1 and 2 and male and female mice in fear-conditioned and control groups despite the lack of significant statistical interactions with these factors

a

Statistical comparisons collapsed across replicate and sex (p<0.05 saline vs. 1.5 g/kg group)