. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Sep;101(3):485–502. doi: 10.1037/a0023233

Table 1.

Summary of regression analyses for Study 2.

	Trust^a			Closeness^a			Evaluation of Partner^a
Predictor	β	t	sr²	β	t	sr²	β	t	sr²
How long ago	−.40	−4.76^**	.16	−.21	−2.38^*	.04	−.41	−4.93^**	.17
Impulsive trust vs. neutral conditioning (C1)	−.20	−2.04^*	.03	−.23	−2.24^*	.04	−.11	−1.17	.01
Impulsive trust vs. positive prime (C2)	−.21	−2.19^*	.03	−.13	−1.24	.01	−.13	−1.28	.01
Reflective trust condition	−.02	< 1	.00	−.04	< 1	.00	−.08	< 1	.01
C1 Contrast by reflective trust	.11	< 1	.00	.20	1.19	.00	.24	1.58	.02
C2 Contrast by reflective trust	.17	1.08	.01	.04	< 1	.01	.10	< 1	.00

p < .05,

^**

p < .01.

Degrees of freedom: first (122), second (119), third (117).