Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 13;25(9):2773–2843. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1799-6

Table 2.

RCT comparing laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia surgery with infectious complications as a secondary endpoint

Study Name, country Antibiotic prophylaxis Total Lap group Lap infect. (%) Open group Open infect. (%) n
Liem et al. (1997) [6] Coala, Netherlands ? 994 487 TEP 0 507 Optional 1.2 0.03
MRC 1999 [7] MRC, UK ? 928 468 TEP, TAPP 2.8 460 Optional 3.1 NS
Berndsen et al. (2002) [8] SMIL I, Sweden No 1,042 518 TAPP 0.8 524 Shouldice 0.8 NS
Neumayer et al. (2004) [9] AV, USA ? 1,983 989 TEP, TAPP 1 994 Lichtenstein 1.4 NS
Eklund et al. (2006) [10] SMIL II, Sweden No lap yes open 1,371 665 TEP 1.4 706 Lichtenstein 0.7 0.21
Total 6,318 3,127 1.2 3,191 1.3

? = Whether antibiotic prophylaxis was given is not reported

NS not significant, Lap laparoscopic, infect infection, TAPP laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair, TEP laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair