Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2011 Sep;41(3):274–283. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.04.015

Table 3.

Longitudinal logistic regression models predicting odds of meeting physical activity guidelines and achieving Action/Maintenance at follow-up

Outcome
Regression Coefficient
Follow-up
6 Months
12 Months
AOR 95% CI AOR 95% CI


physical activity guidelines Control 0.35 (0.17, 0.73) 0.40 (0.18, 0.92)
Counseling vs Control 1.50 (0.69, 3.26) 2.23 (0.89, 5.60)
Baseline PAR ≥150 5.30 (2.33, 12.06) 4.97 (1.95, 12.68)
 Stage Control: Men 0.46 (0.17, 1.26) 0.22 (0.07, 0.72)
Control: Women 0.15 (0.04, 0.58) 0.24 (0.06, 0.88)
Counseling vs Control 1.92 (0.89, 4.16) 2.57 (1.12, 5.89)
Baseline Stage = A/M vs Con/Prep 2.35 (0.87, 6.40) 2.63 (0.81, 8.53)

Note: A/M, Action/Maintenance; Con/Prep, Contemplation/Preparation physical activity guidelines analyses use baseline PAR <150 minutes/week as the reference stratum.

Stage of motivational readiness for exercise analyses use Contemplation/Preparation as the reference stratum.

Control group estimates correspond to odds of a positive outcome within the corresponding reference stratum.