Table 3.
The number of times method 1 or 2 has better performance for the absolute CSMF error in 500 randomly-generated test datasets with varying CSMF composition.
| Cause | A | B | C | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Absolute CSMF error | 160 | 340 | 181 | 319 | 247 | 253 |
The number of times method 1 or 2 has better performance for the absolute CSMF error in 500 randomly-generated test datasets with varying CSMF composition.
| Cause | A | B | C | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Absolute CSMF error | 160 | 340 | 181 | 319 | 247 | 253 |