Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 19;34(9):1913–1918. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0891

Table 3.

Multiple adjusted HRs of type 2 diabetes associated with a two-point increment in the rMED in population subgroups

Number of cases/number of subcohort* HR 95% CI P for interaction
Sex 0.144
 Male 5,946/5,597 0.96 0.93–1.00
 Female 5,670/9,452 0.95 0.91–0.98
Age (years) 0.019
 <50 2,637/5,681 1.00 0.94–1.06
 50–59 5,604/6,119 0.95 0.91–0.98
 ≥60 3,753/3,249 0.96 0.92–1.00
BMI (kg/m2) 0.088
 <25 1,666/6,936 0.92 0.88–0.97
 25–29 5,266/5,987 0.95 0.92–0.98
 ≥30 5,062/2,126 0.99 0.95–1.03
Smoking status 0.393
 Never 4,882/7,038 0.95 0.92–0.99
 Former 3,716/4,038 0.97 0.92–1.01
 Current 3,295/3,827 0.96 0.92–1.01
History of diabetes in a first-degree relative§ 0.527
 No 3,441/5,474 0.92 0.88–0.96
 Yes 1,935/1,138 0.96 0.90–1.04

*Numbers in the subcohort exclude type 2 diabetic case subjects.

†Modified Cox proportional hazards regression models stratified by center and adjusted for sex, BMI (as a continuous variable), educational level (no formal education, primary school, technical/professional school, secondary school, and longer education including university degree), physical activity (inactive, moderately inactive, moderately active, and active), smoking status (never, former, and three categories of current smoker: 1–10 cigarettes day−1, 11–20 cigarettes day−1, and >20 cigarettes day−1), and total calorie intake (as a continuous variable).

‡Heterogeneity among subgroups was tested by adding an interaction term in the model between these variables and rMED.

§Family history of diabetes was not ascertained in the centers in Italy, Spain, Germany, and Oxford.