Table 1.
Fidelity of implementation (FOI) ratings from qualitative ratings
| Facility | FOI Ratings a for Program Components |
Average
b
FOI |
FOI rank | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 c | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |||
| A | 4 | 3 | -- | 3 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3.4 | 2 |
| B | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | -- | 3 | 2 | 3.6 | 4 |
| C | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3.5 | 3 |
| D | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1 | -- | 5 | 2 | 3.0 | 1 |
| Variance | 0.33 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 1.33 | 3.00 | ||
Blank cells: ---, indicates missing data
aRatings: 1 = nonuse, 2 = low compliance, 3 = compliant, 4 = high compliance, 5 = committed; btotal FOI rating was calculated by summing ratings across components and dividing by the number of components for which ratings were made; ccomponents: 1 = availability of a nurse practitioner (NP) case manager, 2 = collaboration between primary care providers and NP case managers, 3 = coordination between primary care (referring) centers and inpatient (referral) centers, 4 = provision of video conferencing sessions, 5 = provision of telemedicine technology, 6 = provision of patient education documentation, 7 = provision of laptop computers, 8 = provision of case manager training.
-- indicates missing data.