Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 22;6(8):e23494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023494

Table 3. Occurrence of claustrophobic events during different phases of the MR procedure.

Intention-to-treat analysis Per-protocol analysis
Short-bore MR group Open MR group P Value Short-bore MR group Open MR group P Value
n/total n (% [95% CI]) n/total n (% [95% CI])
First MR imaging
Total* 33/85 (39 [28 to 50]) 23/87 (26 [18 to 37]) 0.08 30/82 (37 [26 to 48]) 23/87 (26 [18 to 37]) 0.16
Entering the examination room 11/33 (33 [18 to 51]) 1/23 (4 [0 to 22]) 0.01 11/30 (37 [20 to 56]) 1/23 (4 [0 to 22]) 0.007
During positioning on the scanner table 17/33 (52 [34 to 69]) 20/23 (87 [66 to 97]) 0.009 17/30 (57 [37 to 75]) 20/23 (87 [66 to 97]) 0.03
During MR imaging 2/33 (6 [1 to 20]) 2/23 (9 [1 to 28]) 1 2/30 (7 [1 to 22]) 2/23 (9 [1 to 28]) 1
MR imaging after cross-referral
Total* 19/23 (83 [61 to 95]) 21/30 (70 [51 to 85]) 0.35 12/16 (75 [48 to 93]) 18/27 (67 [46 to 84]) 0.73
Entering the examination room 7/19 (37 [16 to 62]) 3/21 (14 [3 to 36]) 0.15 7/12 (58 [28 to 85]) 3/18 (17 [4 to 41]) 0.045
During positioning on the scanner table 4/19 (21 [6 to 46]) 15/21 (71 [48 to 89]) 0.002 4/12 (33 [10 to 65]) 15/18 (83 [59 to 96]) 0.009
During MR imaging 1/19 (5 [0 to 26]) 0/21 (0 [0 to 16]) 0.47 1/12 (8 [0 to 39]) 0/18 (0 [0 to 19]) 0.4

Values are numbers (%) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Percentages may not total 100% because of rounding. P values were obtained using the chi-squared and Fisher's exact test. See Figure 1 for the flow of patients.

*Patients who did not attend their MR appointment due to claustrophobia were classified as having an event for the intention-to-treat analysis but were not otherwise categorized.

Including preparation of the patients on the MR table.